![]() ![]() This journal follows ISO 9001 management standard and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Please add our address into your email contact list. Please contact the administrator of this platform. Keywords: CO 2 emission, Human Capital, Economic Growth, ARDL Model, Ethiopia Policymakers should emphasize human capital development and establish policies, strategies, and programs related to the reduction of CO2 emission in Ethiopia. However, there is no significant causality from human capital to reduction of CO2 emission. Therefore the contribution of non CO2gases is estimated to be <2 of total annual emissions from forest land in Ethiopia. The result of Granger causality showed that a bidirectional causal relationship from reduction of CO2 emission to economic growth, from human capital to economic growth and a unidirectional causal relationship between human capital and reduction of CO2 emission in Ethiopia. This calculation suggests the contribution of non- CO2to total forest-related emissions is in the range of 0.1 37.000 t CO2eq for CO, 0.1 33.000 t CO2eq for CH 11.000 t CO2eq for N2O. The result showed that CO 2 emission has a negative effect in the long-run and positive effect in the short-run, while human capital has a positive effect in the long-run and negative effect in the short-run on economic growth in Ethiopia. Guardian readers believe it's fairer too.This paper examine the causal relationship between CO 2 emission, human capital, and economic growth using an autoregressive distributed lag model during a period of 1981–2017. Even the former UK deputy prime minister John Prescott recently said that per capita emissions are the fairest way of thrashing out a deal in Copenhagen. ![]() These differences – along with countries' historical contributions to global warming – are a crucial part of climate negotiations in Copenhagen this December. Poorer African nations such as Kenya are on an order magnitude less again – the average Kenyan has a footprint of just 0.3 tonnes (a figure that's likely to drop even lower with the country's surge in wind power). While Australia is on 20.6 tonnes per person (partly because of its reliance on CO2-intensive coal) and the UK is half that at 9.7 (explained in part by relatively CO2-light gas power stations), India is on a mere 1.2. Under that measurement, the average American is responsible for 19.8 tonnes per person, and the average Chinese citizen clocks in at 4.6 tonnes.Įxamining CO2 per capita around the world also shows us the gulf between the developed world's responsibility for climate change and that of the developing world. But all that really tells you is that China is a fast-developing country with a lot of people.Ī more useful measurement is carbon emissions per capita (person). Looking at a country's total carbon emissions doesn't tell the full story of a country's contribution to global warming.Ĭhina, for example, is the world "leader" in total emissions (6018m metric tonnes of carbon dioxide) since it overtook the US (5903) in 2007. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |